Connect securely or upload your data  ·  No ads  ·  We never sell your financial data

The complete personal finance app for financial resilience

Can I retire at 62 with $500,000?

Retiring at 62 with $500,000 and spending $3,500 a month, no Social Security: the money runs out at 76 at a moderate 3% real return, from 74 to 79 across the low and high bands, and the grid below answers the same question for any retirement age from 55 to 70 and any balance. Enter your own numbers and see the answer at all three returns.

WealthAge is a personal finance app, on the same shelf as Copilot Money and Monarch Money. Your accounts, transactions, spending, cash flow and net worth live in one place, kept traceable to where each number came from.

The age you stop working and start drawing on savings.

Slider runs 45 to 80; type any age.

Everything you would draw down: investments, retirement accounts, cash.

Slider tops out at $2,000,000; type any figure.

Housing, food, insurance, utilities and minimum debt payments, not discretionary spending.

Slider tops out at $12,000; type any figure.

Off by default. Turn on to see how a claiming age changes the answer.

Your full benefit at your full retirement age of 67, before any early or delayed adjustment. The claiming age below applies that adjustment for you.

Slider tops out at $4,000; type any figure.

Earlier pays less for life; later pays more. Three ages, the ones Social Security itself prices differently.

Your retirement verdict from WealthAge’s personal finance app calculator

This is arithmetic on the scenario you enter, not financial advice for your specific situation.

Example verdict

Runs out at age 76

At a moderate 3% real return. $500,000 at 62, spending $3,500 a month, no Social Security.

Across the three real-return bands on this page, that runs from age 74 at the low end (1% real) to age 79 at the high end (5% real).

This is a useful estimate. Your complete financial picture may change it.

WealthAge can calculate this using your actual accounts, obligations, cash flow and resilience, and keep it updated as your life changes.

The retirement-scenario grid

Ninety scenarios each print a moderate-band verdict with its own range

Six retirement ages, five starting balances, three monthly spending levels, no Social Security. Every cell: the age the money runs out, or “95+” if it lasts to the horizon, at a moderate 3% real return, with the conservative-to-higher range printed beneath it. The calculator above computes any balance, spending level or age exactly.

$3,000 a month in essential spending

$4,500 a month in essential spending

$6,000 a month in essential spending

Every cell: two-phase monthly-compounded real-return depletion (single phase with no Social Security, as in this grid), horizon age 95, moderate band 3% real, range spans 1% to 5% real. An automated predeploy check re-derives every cell from an independent Python implementation of the formula and the build fails on any mismatch; see the methodology below.

The rules of thumb

Four rules of thumb answer “can I retire” every day, on nearly every page that ranks for it. None of them is wrong. All four are honest in one range and misleading past it.

The pages that rank for this question never answer it

The pages that rank for “can I retire at 62 with $500,000” run the same template: a hook, a 4%-rule division, a Social Security paragraph that states the claiming percentages without using them, and “a financial advisor can help you.” A page whose business model is matching you with an advisor cannot afford to say “yes” or “no” on its own, so it never does. The grid above and the calculator at the top of this page state the verdict directly, with the assumptions shown.

The 4% rule is a 30-year number, and retirement horizons aren’t all 30 years

William Bengen introduced the 4% rule in the Journal of Financial Planning in 1994, and the 1998 Trinity study (Cooley, Hubbard and Walz, AAII Journal) popularized it. Both were built and tested against a 30-year retirement: historical U.S. market returns since 1926, 50 to 75% large-cap stocks with the rest in intermediate-term bonds, a tax-free account. Retire at 55 and the horizon to age 95 is 40 years, ten years past what the rule was tested against. Retire at 70 and the horizon is 25 years, five years short.

Applied flatly at every age anyway, as the SmartAsset template and Vanguard’s calculator both do (both checked 13 August 2026), the rule quietly overstates how much a 55-year-old can safely spend and quietly understates how much a 70-year-old can. Wealthvieu’s own age-adjusted withdrawal table already prices the gap: roughly 3.25% at 55, 3.75% at 62, 4.5% at 70. This page’s grid runs the actual horizon at each retirement age instead of one flat percentage.

The 25x rule gets the base right and inherits the same horizon problem

Twenty-five times annual expenses is the 4% rule inverted (1 ÷ 0.04), and its one real improvement is basing the target on spending rather than income, since spending, not salary, is what a retirement actually has to cover. That improvement doesn’t fix the horizon problem: 25x still assumes the same 30-year retirement the 4% rule does, so it is exactly as aggressive at 55 and exactly as conservative at 70.

The 80% income-replacement rule answers a different question than “is this enough”

The 70-to-80%-of-pre-retirement-income guideline traces to the 1980 President’s Commission on Pension Policy and the Georgia State University RETIRE Project’s replacement-ratio studies with Aon Consulting: roughly 75% on average, closer to 90% for low earners, 81% in the 2008 update for a $50,000 earner. It answers “how much income should I target,” not “is $500,000 enough at 62.” A household already living on 60% of its income needs about 60% in retirement, not 80%; a low earner needs closer to 90%, the group the flat rule serves worst; and it prices no part of the pre-Medicare insurance gap an early retiree carries. This page asks for your actual monthly spending instead of a percentage of a salary you may no longer be replacing in full.

Social Security’s claiming age is arithmetic, not a trivia paragraph

Per Congressional Research Service Report R47151 (June 2022), claiming at 62 against a full retirement age of 67 pays a permanent 70% of the full benefit (a 5/9%-per-month reduction for the first 36 months early, 5/12% per month beyond that). Delayed retirement credits accrue at 8% a year from 67 to 70, so claiming at 70 pays 124% of the full benefit; credits stop accruing at 70. That is a 1.77x spread (124 ÷ 70) between the earliest and latest claiming ages on the identical earnings record, larger than most portfolio-return uncertainty over a decade.

This page’s calculator puts the multiplier directly into the depletion math: a second phase of monthly withdrawal, starting at the claiming age, reduced by the claimed benefit. The worked example above shows the same $500,000 scenario turning from “runs out at 76” into “lasts to 95” once a $2,000 benefit claimed at 67 is added.

Common questions

People ask the same six questions about retiring at a given age and amount

Can I retire at 62 with $500,000?

At $3,500 a month in essential spending and no Social Security, the money runs out at age 76 at a moderate 3% real return, ranging from age 74 to 79 across the conservative and higher bands. Add a Social Security benefit and a claiming age in the calculator above and the answer changes: the same scenario with a $2,000 monthly benefit claimed at 67 lasts to 95+ at the moderate and higher bands, and to age 85 at the conservative band, because Social Security replaces most of the monthly draw from age 67 on.

Can I retire at 55 with $2 million?

At $6,000 a month in essential spending and no Social Security, $2,000,000 at 55 lasts to 95 at a moderate 3% real return, and at a higher 5% real return too; only the conservative 1% band runs out at age 87. The grid above stops at $1,500,000, its largest preset; the calculator computes $2,000,000 or any other balance directly by typing a figure into the starting-balance field, not only the grid's five presets.

Can I retire at 60 with $2,500,000?

At $3,000 a month in essential spending and no Social Security, $2,500,000 at 60 lasts to 95 at every real-return band on this page, conservative through higher. The grid's largest preset, $1,500,000 at 60 with the same spending, already lasts to 95 at every band; $2,500,000 clears the same 35-year horizon (60 to 95) with more room to spare.

Is $750,000 enough to retire at 65?

At $4,500 a month in essential spending and no Social Security, $750,000 at 65 runs out at age 82 at a moderate 3% real return (range 79 to 88). At $3,000 a month the same balance and age lasts to 95+ at the moderate and higher bands, and runs out at 88 at the conservative 1% band (see the grid above). Social Security narrows or closes that gap further; add a benefit and claiming age in the calculator to see your own scenario.

Does the 4% rule work at every retirement age?

No. Bengen built the 4% rule for a 30-year retirement. Retire at 55 and the horizon to age 95 is 40 years, ten years longer than the rule was ever tested against; retire at 70 and the horizon is 25 years, five years shorter. A flat 4% withdrawal applied at every age, the way Vanguard’s calculator and the SmartAsset scenario articles apply it (both checked 13 August 2026), is quietly too aggressive at the early end and quietly too conservative at the late end.

How much does claiming Social Security at 62 instead of 70 actually change?

A permanent 30% cut versus a permanent 24% bonus on the same earnings record, a 1.77x spread between the two claiming ages (Congressional Research Service Report R47151, June 2022). On a $2,000 full benefit that is $1,400 a month claimed at 62 against $2,480 a month claimed at 70, a $1,080 monthly difference for the rest of a retirement that can run 25 years or more. The calculator above puts that multiplier directly into the depletion math, as a second phase of monthly withdrawal, not as a separate paragraph you have to do the arithmetic on yourself.

Kept current

Every scenario above is a snapshot. Your own retirement shouldn’t be.

The grid and the calculator both run on numbers you typed in once. Your actual balance moves with the market. Your spending moves with your life. A Social Security estimate you looked up once goes stale the day your earnings record changes.

WealthAge keeps your accounts, transactions, spending and cash flow current, connected or uploaded, so the figures you would type into this page stop being a one-time snapshot.

Get WealthAge

Connect or upload to see your own numbers.

WealthAge Money: net worth $184,200 over time, income $7,840 against spend $5,210, and a projected $1,180 remaining for June.

By retirement age

Limits

This model can’t see your taxes, your health costs, or a bad first five years

Every figure above, the grid and your own calculator result, is arithmetic on the scenario you entered. Here is what it can’t tell you.

Taxes. Neither the grid nor the calculator deducts taxes from a withdrawal or from investment growth. A traditional 401(k) balance and a Roth balance of the same size deplete on different real timelines once taxes are counted.

Healthcare before Medicare. Retiring before 65 means paying for private health insurance until Medicare starts, and this model prices none of it; it belongs in the monthly essential-spending figure you enter.

Sequence risk. This model applies one constant real return every month. A real market does not: two retirees with the same 30-year average return can end up in very different places depending on whether the bad years land in year 2 of retirement or year 22, and this model shows you a smooth path, never the rough one.

Longevity past 95. Age 95 is this page’s stated horizon, matching the convention most retirement calculators in this category use. Some people live longer than that; “95+” on this page means the balance survives to 95, not a guarantee it survives whatever comes after.

Spending that isn’t flat. Real retirement spending is rarely a constant monthly number: it often runs higher in the first active years and again late in life for care costs. This model holds monthly spending constant in real terms throughout.

Everything else you have. A pension, a working spouse, a paid-off house, family help: none of it is in this calculation unless you fold it into the numbers you enter. Treat every verdict on this page as a starting estimate, not a guarantee.

Methodology

Every verdict on this page comes from one published two-phase formula

Phase one runs from your retirement age to your Social Security claiming age (or for the full horizon, if you enter no benefit), drawing your full monthly essential spending from savings. Phase two, if the balance survives phase one, runs from the claiming age to the horizon, drawing your monthly spending minus your claimed Social Security benefit. If the claimed benefit exceeds your spending, phase two never depletes the balance; it stops drawing from it entirely.

Both phases use monthly-compounded real (inflation-adjusted) returns with a constant real withdrawal, the identical formula this site’s savings runway tool already publishes for its own retirement-drawdown mode: a stated annual real return converts to a monthly rate ((1 + annual return)^(1/12) − 1), applied every month to the remaining balance before that month’s withdrawal is taken. The balance is simulated month by month until it can no longer cover a full month’s withdrawal; the month it runs out is resolved to a fraction, then converted to an age (retirement age plus months elapsed ÷ 12, floored to a whole year for the printed verdict).

The claiming-age multiplier (70% at 62, 100% at the full retirement age of 67, 124% at 70) is sourced to Congressional Research Service Report R47151, “Social Security: Adjustment Factors for Early or Delayed Benefit Claiming” (June 2022), corroborated against Schwab and AARP explainer pages carrying the same CRS figures, checked 13 August 2026. It is applied to the monthly benefit figure you enter, which this page asks for as your full, age-67 amount so the three claiming-age options apply one consistent adjustment rather than three separately-entered numbers that could disagree with each other.

The horizon of 95 matches the convention this category already uses: NerdWallet’s and SmartAsset’s own retirement calculators both default to a life expectancy of 95 (checked 13 August 2026). This page names longevity risk past 95 in the limits above rather than assuming it away.

The grid above uses no Social Security (a single-phase case of the same formula) so that every cell isolates exactly three variables: retirement age, starting balance and monthly spending. The calculator adds the claiming-age phase on top of the identical arithmetic. Both run from the same shared code, so the grid and the calculator can never silently disagree; an automated predeploy check re-derives every printed grid cell from an independent Python implementation of the formula and the build fails on any mismatch, most recently confirmed 13 August 2026.

Published 13 August 2026. Horizon: age 95. Real-return bands: conservative 1%, moderate 3%, higher 5%. Social Security claiming multipliers: Congressional Research Service Report R47151 (June 2022). Competitor facts verified 13 August 2026.

Corrections: 2026-08-13: first publication.

In a search-results sample taken 13 August 2026, SmartAsset’s scenario articles and their Yahoo Finance syndications occupied most of the first page for this query family, and its template never states a verdict: its business is matching readers with advisors. Verified the same day: Vanguard’s retirement income calculator hard-codes a 4% withdrawal at any retirement age; NerdWallet’s applies a flat 70%-of-income retirement budget with fixed 6%/5% return defaults and treats Social Security as a manual income field rather than adjusting it for claiming age. Yearfold runs a Monte Carlo simulation and builds the claiming age into its own optimizer, the strongest math we found; Wealthvieu publishes an age-adjusted withdrawal table, the closest structure to the grid above. Neither carries the distribution, and none of the large-brand calculators carries either one: this page’s contribution is the whole grid server-rendered in one place with the method published.

A verdict is not a plan. Your own accounts are.

Every figure above answers the question it was built for. None of it can see your taxes, your health costs, or the five years that actually decide a retirement.

WealthAge keeps your accounts, transactions, spending and cash flow current, connected or uploaded, so the figures on this page stop being a one-time snapshot.

Get WealthAge

Connect or upload to start.

See how it works